Summary of Leegin On its facts, Leegin is a common resale price maintenance case in a terminated dealer context. Plaintiff PSKS operates Kay’s Kloset, a women’s apparel store in Texas. Defendant Leegin manufactures and distributes leather goods and accessories, including leather belts sold under the brand name “Brighton.” Leegin believes that, for some of its products, smaller.
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States, 356 U.S. 1,5 (1958). The Court also The Court also tends to focus its holdings on the conduct even when it engages in a rule of reason analysis that may.
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System 227 Notes and Questions 234 Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc 235 Notes and Questions 238 Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society 239 Notes and Questions 245 National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. Board OfRegents 247 Notes and Questions 256 California Dental Ass'n v.
A 'read' is counted each time someone views a publication summary (such as the title, abstract, and list of authors), clicks on a figure, or views or downloads the full-text.
Carnation Company v. Pacific Westbound Conference. Argued. Nov 8, 1965. Nov 8, 1965. Decided. Feb 28, 1966. Feb 28, 1966. Citation. 383 US 213 (1966) Case-Swayne Company, Inc. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc. Is Sunkist Growers duly organized under the Capper-Volstead Act's agricultural collective exemption when fifteen percent of its members are for-profit processors of agricultural products.